Paradise Lost vs Genesis Essay

In the book of genesis 31-6, the passage teaches the story of how fiend tempts eventide into causing the act that leads to the get along of mankind. Of this biblical account, is where John Milton gained dream for the idea of is work, Paradise broken. Miltons plot line and huge array of imagination stage the tale in a polar shed light on than that told in the Bible. mend twain accounts of the chance on, are used to guide the said(prenominal) story and sequel, the both versions allot some comparative similarities and many contrast discordences.In the biblical account of the betide, the dialogue overlap between daemon and even is less developed and unknown in detail than that of Miltons tale. morning stars arise of evening is untold to a gr downer extent upfront and less individualised in meaning. He quickly takes grasp of the topic of the forbidden fruit. His causa is shown with a much shallower depth of intimacy towards evening. He uses a more 2-dimes ional approach to tempt Eve to feast from the manoeuvre that God has forbidden her and fling to eat from.He is shown to have a wishing of cunning, and directly disproves and belittles Eves fears of ingest from the tree with a lack of creative thinking and slyness. As the story continues, Eve is in the long run won over by lure and eats from the tree. The story is left at that moment. John Miltons Paradise Lost tells this homogeneous tale with a hardly a(prenominal) changes in detail. hellers sign approach of Eve is much more complex than that shown in the biblical version. fiend uses charm and flattery to woe Eves trust towards his parole, rather that to that of the word of God.With Eves wariness of his gestures, he then refers to her figure as that of a goddess and continues to exemplify her beauty, which in turn, soothes Eves doubts. During their conversation, the two exchange dialogue that, to the reader, gives a more in depth and demonstrative look at what Satan is attempting to utter to Eve. Instead of simply disproving Eves fears of the consequences of eating from the tree, He lies and portrays himself as a living example of Gods false threats of death. This portraying by Satan leads Eve to yearn for the wisdom and intimacy that Satan promises when the forbidden fruit is consumed.From the textual matter So glozd the Tempter, and his Proem tund? Into the embrace of Eve his words made expression, shows how Satans words pull up Eves attention and do in fact woe her heart. after this temptation, Eve eats from the tree, and Milton uses intense imagery to describe events that come after this event. Milton describes how worldly concern feels the wound of Eves sin. Eves inner emotions are brought to light with her disobedience to God. She becomes worried of Adams reaction of this act against God, and fears she will be replaced.Her fear of being disowned by Adam comes before her fear of God. This is her prime reasoning for wanting to share t he fruit with Adam. While the two versions of the same story differ to some degree, the similarities are equally noticeable. on that point is no question that there was, in fact, some sort of dialogue shared between Satan and Eve. In two accounts, Satan disguises himself in the form of a serpent. In this form is where he approaches Eve and begins to woe her from her promise to not eat from the forbidden fruit.Both stories convey the same outcome of this event by Eve sharing the fruit with Adam. By examining these two works, its easy to notice the horizon that Milton used to convey his story to the reader. Miltons account of the fall of man uses broad imagery and creative story telling, save its meaning still shares some of the same qualities of the biblical version told in generation 31-6. While both accounts of the fall convey the same overall outcome and meaning, some aspects of the stories compare and contrast greatly.